Re: [Pyme-help] Re-activating pyme maintenance

[Bernhard R. <ber...@in...>]

Am Samstag, 3. Mai 2014 20:50:35 schrieb Martin Albrecht:
> Hi all,
>
> on a related note: I've applied my old-ish patch + some "fixes" to setup.py
> to the fixes branch of:
>
>    https://bitbucket.org/malb/pyme
>
> In particular,
>
>    $ pip install git+https://bitbucket.org/malb/pyme@fixes
>
> now works on my machine.

The manual (*) say we should fork now.
Does it make sense  to still do this on SF?

I see two advantages of forking on SF.
a) people will mor easily find the "continuation"
b) SF uses Allura a Free Software hosting platform, were bitbucket is 
proprietary
Drawbacks: 
c) effort
d) advertisment on sf

Martin do you intent to at least maintain pyme a bit?
Then I'll just change the link on wiki.gnupg.org 

(*) http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/Abandoned Projects/

-- 
www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO)    www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member)
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner