[Pylets-devel] Re: about pylet
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
frobenius
|
From: Ben <be...@me...> - 2004-03-22 18:16:00
|
sorry i'm on vacation atm so can't give you detailed responses. please subscribe / post your msgs to the mailing list! the performance testing i did was very limited. i was testing how fast the dispatching / caching framework was. so i tested very small pages with tons of hits: this distinguishes between pure throughput and the dispatching time. it was within 1.5x the apache times. i can publish better numbers when i get back. the framework is changing bit by bit, and also i use freebsd, whereas most people seem to use linux (prefork vs. worker mpm.) thus i'm a little concerned about publishing stats. but i'll try to run some better tests soon. btw i'm thinking of changing my dispatch model to a shared finite-state automata, which i think should be equally fast and a bit more flexible. but i have to think about it for a bit first. mod_python sessions are only in 3.1.3 which are only compatible with apache 2.0.+. they are thread safe. actually my code for the shared cache (which uses sleepycat) could be substituted for a perhaps modest performance gain. take care, B ps the questions are welcome, not annoying! On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, vincent delft wrote: > I've just discovered your pylet code. > Can I just ask you 2 quesitions : > 1) > have you performance figures ? > To have a point of comparison you should give the > perf. you have with static html pages (for example > index.html.en) with apache. > > 2) > You sessions are based on Mod_python sessions. What > about this architecture on Apache-2.0 ? > Does this is cross thread consistent ? > > > Thanks > > PS : sorry if I come with annoying questions. Then > drop the mail. > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html > |