On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 12:55 +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> The latex patch should have been implemented like this. Maybe you
> could embed it in a better way.
> O. Certik
I'll take a look at the patch this weekend. I've been meaning to
revisit the way stringification is done, anyway.
-Jonathan
> --- pyginac-orig/src/basic.cpp 2005-03-30 22:55:17.000000000 +0200
> +++ pyginac/src/basic.cpp 2005-04-26 12:47:31.176443904 +0200
> @@ -397,6 +397,27 @@
> return converter.returned_hash;
> }
>
> +//template< typename GinacPrintable>
> +//print_to_string_latex(const GinacPrintable & This)
> +/*std::string
> +print_to_string_latex(const GiNaC::basic& This)
> +{
> + std::ostringstream output;
> + output << GiNaC::latex;
> + output << This;
> + return output.str();
> +}*/
> +template< typename GinacPrintable>
> +std::string
> +print_to_string_latex( GinacPrintable* object)
> +{
> + std::ostringstream output;
> + GiNaC::print_latex context( output);
> + object->print( context);
> + return output.str();
> +}
> +
> +
> } // !namespace anonymous
>
> void
> @@ -524,6 +545,7 @@
>
> // Overrides for special Python object behavior
> .def( "__str__", &print_to_string<basic>)
> + .def( "print_latex", &print_to_string_latex<basic>)
> .def( "__hash__", wrap_hash, "Compute a hash of an expression.")
> ;
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
> Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
> Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
> Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix
> _______________________________________________
> Pyginac-users mailing list
> Pyg...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyginac-users
|
