Re: [PyGiNaC-users] latex patch - upgrade

[Jonathan B. <jbr...@ea...>]

On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 12:55 +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> The latex patch should have been implemented like this. Maybe you
> could embed it in a better way.
> O. Certik

I'll take a look at the patch this weekend.  I've been meaning to
revisit the way stringification is done, anyway.

-Jonathan

> --- pyginac-orig/src/basic.cpp  2005-03-30 22:55:17.000000000 +0200
> +++ pyginac/src/basic.cpp       2005-04-26 12:47:31.176443904 +0200
> @@ -397,6 +397,27 @@
>      return converter.returned_hash;
>  }
> 
> +//template< typename GinacPrintable>
> +//print_to_string_latex(const GinacPrintable & This)
> +/*std::string
> +print_to_string_latex(const GiNaC::basic& This)
> +{
> +       std::ostringstream output;
> +       output << GiNaC::latex;
> +       output << This;
> +       return output.str();
> +}*/
> +template< typename GinacPrintable>
> +std::string
> +print_to_string_latex( GinacPrintable* object)
> +{
> +           std::ostringstream output;
> +           GiNaC::print_latex context( output);
> +           object->print( context);
> +           return output.str();
> +}
> +
> +
>  } // !namespace anonymous
> 
>  void
> @@ -524,6 +545,7 @@
> 
>          // Overrides for special Python object behavior
>                 .def( "__str__", &print_to_string<basic>)
> +               .def( "print_latex", &print_to_string_latex<basic>)
>          .def( "__hash__", wrap_hash, "Compute a hash of an expression.")
>                 ;
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
> Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
> Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
> Click here to start!  http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix
> _______________________________________________
> Pyginac-users mailing list
> Pyg...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyginac-users