From: Matthias B. <ba...@ir...> - 2006-07-31 06:55:10
Roman Yakovenko wrote:
> I'd like to get your feedback:
> 1. Whether the document is clear or not?
Looks good (but there's a typo in the title: "Inerting" -> "Inserting").
I was only a bit confused about the last section ("Insert code to class
wrapper") because it tried to solve a problem that has already been
solved in the previous section.
I guess it would be better if the last two sections would try to solve
different problems where the respective functions are the best solution.
Otherwise a user who's reading this tutorial might ask why the API
contains two functions that are supposed to do the "same" thing.
- Matthias -
From: Roman Y. <rom...@gm...> - 2006-07-31 20:07:41
On 7/31/06, Matthias Baas <ba...@ir...> wrote:
> Roman Yakovenko wrote:
> > I'd like to get your feedback:
> > 1. Whether the document is clear or not?
>
> Looks good (but there's a typo in the title: "Inerting" -> "Inserting").
Fixed.
> I was only a bit confused about the last section ("Insert code to class
> wrapper") because it tried to solve a problem that has already been
> solved in the previous section.
> I guess it would be better if the last two sections would try to solve
> different problems where the respective functions are the best solution.
> Otherwise a user who's reading this tutorial might ask why the API
> contains two functions that are supposed to do the "same" thing.
Fixed. Added real use case, with description and solution.
Matthias, this document contains section that I marked as "Not implemented".
Can you take a look on it and to comment?
Thank you.
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
From: Matthias B. <ba...@ir...> - 2006-08-01 12:56:56
Roman Yakovenko wrote:
> Matthias, this document contains section that I marked as "Not
> implemented".
> Can you take a look on it and to comment?
Well, that function looks useful to me. I take it, it adds that code to
the file where the corresponding class is located, right?
Then I think I could have used that already for my "arg policies".
Currently, I'm creating new source files.
- Matthias -
From: Roman Y. <rom...@gm...> - 2006-08-01 13:26:06
On 8/1/06, Matthias Baas <ba...@ir...> wrote:
> Roman Yakovenko wrote:
> > Matthias, this document contains section that I marked as "Not
> > implemented".
> > Can you take a look on it and to comment?
>
> Well, that function looks useful to me. I take it, it adds that code to
> the file where the corresponding class is located, right?
Right and I will try to implement this feature this evening
> Then I think I could have used that already for my "arg policies".
> Currently, I'm creating new source files.
What do you mean?
--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/
From: Matthias B. <ba...@ir...> - 2006-08-02 09:21:25
Roman Yakovenko wrote:
>> Then I think I could have used that already for my "arg policies".
>> Currently, I'm creating new source files.
>
> What do you mean?
I mean, I probably could have added the source code for the newly
generated wrapper functions right to the original source files created
by pyplusplus instead of creating my own source files.
- Matthias -