Re: [pygccxml-development] Any recent commits that may affect performance

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 2/16/07, Allen Bierbaum <al...@vr...> wrote:
>
> >>> I agree.  When I saw that it surprised me.  Is there anything you can
> >>> think of that may have changed in the past several months that would
> >>> increase the number of times that the full_name code is being called?
> >>> In other words, is there a new algorithm in the code that needs to be
> >>> made smarter to increase performance?
> >>>
> >
> > Can you do me a favor:
> > pygccxml.declarations.declaration_t.
> > _get_name function implemented as
> >
> >
> > def _get_name( self ):
> >
> >     return self._get_name_impl()
> >
> >
> > can you change the implementation to "return self._name" and to run this under
> > profiler? I expect this change to increase performance.
> >
> That increased performance by about 5%.  So a small speedup, but not a
> significant speedup.  Any other ideas?

I thought about it and I don't know. May be you are doing something wrong.
Python-Ogre project is not a smallest one, but it takes only 5 minutes( without
cache and files ) to generate code. During code generation they also parse
Ogre source tree to extract documentation. Can you show your script?

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/