|
From: Roman Y. <rom...@gm...> - 2006-10-10 12:57:39
|
On 10/10/06, Allen Bierbaum <al...@vr...> wrote: > Is there a way I can override Py++ and tell it not to generate a > boost::python::pure_virtual on a member method? f.virtuality = declaration.VIRTUALITY_TYPES.VIRTUAL > I know that normally this would be a bad idea, but I have a case where I > am only dealing with derived types and for some reason when the > pure_virtual is there it causes all calls to that method to fail with > "RuntimeError: Pure virtual function called". When I remove the > pure_virtual call from the bindings, everything works as expected. Also > for this library this is fine because objects can only be created > through factory methods and the system will not allow creation of any of > the base classes with pure virtual methods. Py++ & pygccxml gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot. :-) -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/ |
