Re: [pygccxml-development] [new feature]add_properties

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 10/4/06, Kevin Bluck <kev...@gm...> wrote:
> Roman Yakovenko wrote:
> > Hi. I added new future - add_properties.
> > The idea behind this functionality is to automatically recognize and
> > add properties to the class.
> >
> Excellent idea. I was just thinking about how to script something like this.
>
> > my_class.add_properties()
> > or
> > my_class.add_properties( exclude_accessors=True )
> >
>
> I have a class with both getValue() and setValue(). setValue() is
> explicitly excluded (it happens to be a protected member and I don't
> want protected members.)
>
> I noticed that in this case add_properties() does not automatically add
> a read-only property Value for the still-visible getValue(). You have to
> specify param exclude_accessors=True.
>
> If I do not explicitly exclude member function setValue(), it binds a
> setValue() function as expected, but it still generates a read-only
> property Value regardless of exclude_accessors True or False.

This is your use case, as I understand it:

struct data_t{
    int getValue() const { return 1;}
protected:
    void setValue(int){}
};

where setValue is excluded, right?

If I am right, than I can not reproduce the bug ( behaviour ) you
describe, sorry.
Can you create small example that reproduce the problem?

Thank you

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/