Re: [pygccxml-development] Member variables and their access type?

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 10/4/06, Matthias Baas <ba...@ir...> wrote:
> After updating I noticed the modification from r616 that the
> _set_arguments() method was commented out which broke the function
> transformer unit test.
> What's the reason why arguments should not be set? _get_arguments()
> still returns the internal list, so the class isn't really protected
> from being modified. I'm using this as a workaround now, but obviously
> I'm not supposed to change the list...?

No, I had a bug, that has been discovered on huge project while using
properties.
It was very difficult to find it, so I commented the _set_arguments, I
thought it will help to find
the bug.

I committed the fix.

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/