Re: [pygccxml-development] Member variables and their access type?

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 10/4/06, Matthias Baas <ba...@ir...> wrote:
> Roman Yakovenko wrote:
> >> I just noticed a slight problem with Py++. I tried to ignore private
> >> member variables
> >
> > Py++ should ignore them by default, so I don't understand what you are
> > trying to do.
>
> Well, don't worry, I guess this is just an "artifact" of using
> pypp_api... ;)
> (I was just trying to get rid of some warnings)
>
> >> but the class variable_t doesn't have a property
> >> "access_type". It seems that property is only available on classes
> >> derived from member_calldef_t.
> >
> > Right, because I don't have global_variable_t and member_variable_t classes
> >
> >> So how can I check the access type of a member variable?
> >
> > mem_var.parent.find_out_member_access_type( mem_var )
>
> Is this going to change in the future (so that there's a property
> access_type)? I think it's not intuitive that member variables have to
> be treated differently than member functions (after all, they are both
> members and the access type is a property of a member).

Done


-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/