Re: [pygccxml-development] Adding properties

[Kevin B. <kev...@gm...>]

> I know it is not as simple as you expect. If you can wait I plan to 
> add support for properties in a week or two
> ...
> foo.property_( foo.member_function( 'get_x' ), foo.member_function( 
> 'set_x' ) )
> #or may be next interface
> foo.property_(  'get_x', 'set_x' )
I can wait.

I think it would be preferable to accept either type of parameter, since 
sometimes you may already have a reference to a member_function_t 
available and just passing it would be convenient, but if you don't 
having to make a temporary via the query API seems unnecessarily verbose.

--- Kevin