Re: [pygccxml-development] 2 Questions

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 9/12/06, Allen Bierbaum <al...@vr...> wrote:
> Ok, this didn't work out so well.  I found a way to ignore these methods
> but this made it so the wrapper didn't generate a function at all.
> Which in turn makes the wrapper a pure class that can be instantiated
> and thus the compile fails.  It seems like what I would want here is for
> the wrapper class to generate a method but then for the exposer for the
> real class to not generate bindings for that method.  Unfortunately I
> don't see a way to do this right now. :(

You mean in class wrapper to create the function, but after this in class_<...>
not to register it right? Well the function is registered only in base class

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/