Re: [pygccxml-development] finalize yet again....

[Allen B. <al...@vr...>]

Matthias Baas wrote:

>Hi,
>
>meanwhile it has come up a few times now in this list, but I believe the 
>finalize functionality is not yet in place, is it?
>  
>
Last time I checked it was not.  I use a rather ugly hack in goodies to 
try to force the equivalent of a finalize but I have gotten mixed results.

-Allen

>What is the current status on this? In particular, what properties will 
>control this?
>
>As you might have read already in the other thread from today, the 
>function transformation feature on non-virtual functions should 
>optionally result in the creation of a wrapper class or not. I'd say 
>this basically is already something that can be controlled by the 
>finalize functionality. So it would be nice if I could use the same 
>attributes/properties that will also be used by the other parts of Py++.
>
>- Matthias -
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
>Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
>Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
>_______________________________________________
>pygccxml-development mailing list
>pyg...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pygccxml-development
>
>  
>