Re: [pygccxml-development] Status of code inserters

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

Good evening.  I just finished to read code inserters document.

* I think we should give a name to the feature. I propose
   "Function Transformation".
  This is basically what we do.

* Untill this feature, the only classes that generate code were code creators.
   Py++ design\architecture is described here
   ( http://language-binding.net/pyplusplus/documentation/architecture.html ).
   I prefer to stay with it, hence I ask you how you see this feature
is integrated
   within Py++.

* WrapperManager. It is presented in the document as a "Template" class. From
  my experience it is not possible to build such class without using
tons of if-else
  statements.

* Coding convention. I really don't want to introduce

I propose to begin to work on the feature.

* To create C++ code and Boost.Python expected code. Thus we will see
   examples and the goal. Also I think it will give us better understanding
   of the subject.

   I can write do this.

* To create design. I'd like to see classes and methods, with responcibility
  description. This will give us an ability to split the work. Also we
will be able
  to take a use case and to see what code user will have to write in order
  to apply a transformation.


-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/