Re: [pygccxml-development] special functions/operators

[Matthias B. <ba...@ir...>]

Roman Yakovenko wrote:
>> But in the above example f is already a "real" declaration that will get
>> turned into a "real" code creator, so all the above features could be
>> used, couldn't they?
> 
> I just wanted to save time :-). I can implement the feature, but it
> will take some time.
> Do you want to try to implement it?

Well, currently I have no need for this feature for the Maya bindings 
(as I said, Py++ doesn't see my manually created functions so I would 
have to stick to cdef anyway (which doesn't impose any disadvantage for 
me yet)).
Apart from that, I'd first love to hear Neal's opinion on what the API 
should look like anyway.
(And I'm still busy with the arg policies...)

- Matthias -