Re: [pygccxml-development] Future of pypp_api...

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 8/22/06, Matthias Baas <ba...@ir...> wrote:
>
> Just to clarify, compared to the Py++ high-level API pypp_api is not a
> *new* API. pypp_api was created by Allen and me because we were not
> satisfied with the way py++ had to be used at that time (there hasn't
> been any high-level API at all). Obviously the general concepts from our
> experimental prototype did convince Roman and so he implemented his own
> version of a high-level API which is based on the ideas from pypp_api
> but which does some things differently. To me it was just another
> "prototype" to try out alternative ways. But as it is integrated into
> the pyplusplus code base it has become the official API.
> Anyway, this explains why there are a lot of similarities between the
> two APIs.

Matthias is right. The pypp_api is not new. The main problem is that it takes
time to learn to work in "open source" team.

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/