Re: [pygccxml-development] Feature request: Creating thread safe methods

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 8/1/06, Matthias Baas <ba...@ir...> wrote:
> >> If you mean that the actual policy class is outside py++ (but of course,
> >> the framework for this to work is inside py++), then I agree.... :)
> >
> > I think we understand each other.  I meant, that you will define what
> > services you will need from py++ in order to implement this feature
> > efficiently. Also do you
> > mean "actual policy class" is something similar to classes that derives
> > from ArgTransformerBase?
>
> Yes, exactly.

Please take a look on decl_wrappers.constructor_t class. It has "body" property.
I think, all you need to implement the feature is similar property on
member_function_t
class. Actually you will need 2 properties:
1. body
2. default_virtual_body ( better name is desired ).

Or something like this. If those properties contain a text, pyplusplus
will use it
as function body, otherwise it will generate the body.

I mean something similar to what "inserting code" document describes.

> > By the way, do you want to rename it? Thread safety has nothing to do with
> > arguments.
>
> Yes, I know. I suppose, eventually we have to find a better name (but I
> think "call wrapper policy" also doesn't really capture it...)

Function transform policies?

> > Matthias, can you write some document that will contain description of
> > what you are going to do:
>
> I tried to come up with some initial document here:
> https://realityforge.vrsource.org/view/PyPP/CodeInserter

It is a pleasure to work with you :-)

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/