Re: [pygccxml-development] typedef lookup feature from long ago...
Brought to you by:
mbaas,
roman_yakovenko
From: Allen B. <al...@vr...> - 2006-06-19 22:10:39
|
Roman Yakovenko wrote: > On 5/31/06, Allen Bierbaum <al...@vr...> wrote: > >> Roman: >> >> Taking into account that you will be out of contact soon, there is one >> feature I know I am going to need that I used in the old prototype API. >> I must apologize that I don't remember the exact details, but what it >> boiled down to was being able to lookup a full resolved type from a >> typedef. >> >> So if I had something like: >> >> typedef really_complex< nested<int>, ugly<long>, 56> simple_t; >> >> I would need to be able to look it up from simple_t to get the type >> information. It is the mTypeDefMap inside the old pypp_api (it is still >> in experimental). >> >> The code to look at is in parse() at the end: >> >> typedef_decls = declarations.make_flatten(parsed_decls) >> typedef_decls = decls = filter( lambda x: (isinstance( x, >> declarations.typedef_t ) and >> not >> x.name.startswith('__') and >> x.location.file_name != >> "<internal>") >> , typedef_decls ) >> >> self.mTypeDefMap = {} >> for d in typedef_decls: >> type_def_name = d.name >> full_name = declarations.full_name(d) >> if full_name.startswith("::"): # Remove the base namespace >> full_name = full_name[2:] >> real_type_name = d.type.decl_string >> if real_type_name.startswith("::"): # Remove base namespace >> real_type_name = real_type_name[2:] >> self.mTypeDefMap[full_name] = real_type_name >> >> >> So my question is, do I have another "easy" way to do this with the >> current API? > > > Typedef class has 2 properties: name and type. I believe type is what > you are looking for. .type is the correct type, but it is not the decl_wrapper for the type that the typedef aliases. For example: typedef really_complex< nested<int>, ugly<long>, 56> simple_t; td = ns.typedef("simple_t") td is a pygccxml.declarations.cpptypes.declared_t and td.declaration is a pyplusplus.decl_wrapper.typedef_wrapper.typedef_t but what I want is the class_wrapper for "really_complex< nested<int>, ugly<long>, 56>". How do I get to this object? -Allen > >> I probably won't need it until this weekend or the beginning of next >> week, but if you are going to get busy I wanted to ask before you have >> better things to do then answer e-mails from pesky people like me. :) > > > :-) > >> -Allen >> >> > > |