Re: [pygccxml-development] Abstract Classes

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 5/31/06, Lakin Wecker <lak...@gm...> wrote:
> My bad.  It _does_ seem to work out of the box.  The problem was that
> I had excluded a parent class which had pure virtual functions,
> because it had some void* stuff that I was going to deal with later
> ...
>
> Sorry for the confusion and noise.

You are not completly wrong. In most cases, py++ guide-line - "user
knows better".
But there are cases, when py++ say - "no way, he made a mistake". Your use case
is a second one. In this case py++ should at least generate some
warning in source
file. Can you post small example of code? I will add it to my todo list.

Thanks

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/