[pygccxml-development] Re: Small patch for two things

[Allen B. <al...@vr...>]

Roman Yakovenko wrote:

> On 5/17/06, Allen Bierbaum <al...@vr...> wrote:
>
>> I am fine with either.  They really do the same thing behind the
>> scenes.  Mine could be easier to understand since the user sees it as
>> part of their method call, but I am not going to argue it either way.
>
>
> Thanks
>
>> What about the other patch, the one that allows adopt_include to take a
>> string as an argument?
>
>
> I forgot aboit it. I will add it, but function name will be
> add_include. Is it fine with you?

Sure, I am fine with whatever function name you like.  Now that you 
explained what adopt_include means it makes sense to me.

Thanks.


-Allen