Re: [pygccxml-development] Feature proposal: "Argument policies"

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 4/19/06, Roman Yakovenko <rom...@gm...> wrote:

I'd like to add next example, from what you can see that argument
policies should be able to deal with more complex case:

//read from some file
int read( byte* buffer, unsigned int buffer_size );

This is very interesting use case for "argument policies", because we
should deal
with two arguments at the same time. The generated code will not be
very different
from code generated by using OutputArray/InputArray policies.

I can create an example, that binds between return value and some argument.

I want to say that "argument policies" feature should be rename. New
feature should deal
with an examples I showed. So it does not deal any more with single
argument, but with
whole function.

Bottom line - new name needed.

Suggestions:

[ function ] wrapper call policies

Comments?

--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/