Re: [pygccxml-development] pyplusplus is a bit too optimistic?

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 4/18/06, Neal Becker <ndb...@gm...> wrote:
> I used the attached .hpp file to generate the attached .cpp.
>
> I believe this .cpp would not compile.  The problem is that it includes .=
def
> of "Copy" function.  This is a template - only an explicit instantiation =
of
> it could be exposed to python.

And you are right.

> I guess I need to tell pyplusplus what functions I want exposed?

This is up to you. You can rename this function: Copy<int, int> and
then you can
succesfuly export this function.

> It would be nice if pyplusplus detected this error.  When it writes "&Cop=
y" it
> should realize there is no such function.

I thought about this and it seems to me that I have a solution. Please
comment it:
Every function contains "mangled" string. From this string, I think, I
can get all information
I need. Thus I will be able to change function name to the full one.

--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/