Re: [pygccxml-development] array_t vs pointer_t

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On 4/11/06, Matthias Baas <ba...@ir...> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I'm wrapping a method that takes one single argument of type "double
> scale[3]". In the argument list of the corresponding declaration object
> this appears as a pointer_t object with a double_t object as base. What
> I'm missing is the '3'.
> I noticed that pyplusplus defines a type array_t. Shouldn't the above
> argument be an array_t instead of a pointer_t to a double? Is this a bug
> in pyplusplus, in gccxml or something else?

I could be wrong, but this is how C/C++ works. Array is passed by pointers.
Am I wrong? Even if I wrong, GCC-XML reports this.

I will think what can be done.

> - Matthias -

--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/