[pygccxml-development] array_t vs pointer_t
Brought to you by:
mbaas,
roman_yakovenko
From: Matthias B. <ba...@ir...> - 2006-04-11 12:31:20
|
Hi again, I'm wrapping a method that takes one single argument of type "double scale[3]". In the argument list of the corresponding declaration object this appears as a pointer_t object with a double_t object as base. What I'm missing is the '3'. I noticed that pyplusplus defines a type array_t. Shouldn't the above argument be an array_t instead of a pointer_t to a double? Is this a bug in pyplusplus, in gccxml or something else? - Matthias - |