Re: [pygccxml-development] Adding code creators to decl_wrappers...

[Matthias B. <ba...@ir...>]

Roman Yakovenko wrote:
> Before I start, I want you to know that I thought about this feature
> from the moment I saw it. It was not clear to me how it should be implemented.
> [...]

I realized I'm still missing the "global view" on the implementation of 
  pyplusplus and that my approach was too short-sighted (for example, I 
totally neglected that someone might want to add stuff to the class 
wrappers) and I agree that a more general mechanism should be implemented.
However, I'm afraid I'm not able to implement that myself yet as your 
explanations contained some stuff I'm either not familiar with or I 
don't see how a concrete implementation would look like.
But as I do have a working solution for the moment, I can live with that 
until the "official" version is in. I suppose it would also be no big 
deal to move the (limited) functionality that I currently need to the 
high level layer, so that I can again use the same version of pyplusplus 
that everyone else is using as well (instead of having a "private" branch).

> In general this is what I expected so much time :-). Also does it mean that
> you use module_builder_t class and you more or less happy with it's interface?

I'm still using the module builder from the experimental module.
But I did notice that you've added the selection interface to the 
appropriate decl_wrappers.

> P.S. Do you see the hour I sent this message? - As you can guess
> I have Internet at home.

Ah, welcome back to the online community! :)

- Matthias -