|
From: Roman Y. <rom...@gm...> - 2006-03-05 06:50:05
|
On 3/2/06, Matthias Baas <ba...@ir...> wrote: > How do you rename a set of overloaded methods? I think, I understand what are you talking about. I think that this is a convenience functionality and could be implemented as standalone function def rename_overloaded( function_or_functions, new_name ): ... I prefer not to insert such functionality to the first draft of interface. I think it will pollute it and we will not be able to evaluate the interfac= e. I do think that in future versions we will\should add such functionality. > > > or to add the same method to multiple found classes in a namespace. I don't understand this case at all. > > In the Maya SDK there are a couple of related classes that basically > have the same interface (e.g. vector, float vector, point, float point, > color, then the same thing for array versions etc). When decorating > those classes I can treat every class of such a group the same and apply > the same operations. This is where being able to select stuff from > several classes at once can be quite handy. May I give you a small advice? You can combine between power of pyplusplus = and power of C++. I think that using creating single template for every group is better solution. But I could be wrong. > I'm not arguing that this way of seeing it is superior to the > "recursive" flag, it's just one way I was trying out and it did work for > me rather well. But I admit that the "matched" vs "contained" thing and > operations like rename() being slightly different than other operations > adds to the complexity. So I think it's still worthwhile to try other > approaches as well. Well, I read it and I think I've got the idea. Wiki is the way do discuss t= his. I will try to add new entry/ edit existing one that explains the functional= ity. -- Roman Yakovenko C++ Python language binding http://www.language-binding.net/ |
