Re: [pygccxml-development] Project architecture and Py++

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Alexey Stepanov
<Ale...@ro...> wrote:
> Thanks a lot the reply. If I understood your advice correctly, such an approach is not good for me, for it had got some important drawbacks.
> (i.e. I have to make header files, and cpp for them is to be generated with the code injection)
>
> Firstly, in any case this code is being located in the same cpp files with the wrappers, though I have not corrected them (time of compilation!).
> Secondly, before correction the code must be written first in the separate files, and then the generating script is be executed (time on gccxml!).
> Thirdly, the manually made headers have to be corrected separately from realizations.
>
> Looking at the generated file structure I surmised, that there is an ordinary possibility to move the wrapeprs into the header file
> (I have not found such a one) and simply include them into the generated file (I've found such a possibility).
>
> Do you have any ideas how to move in this direction?

May be it is my English, but I am not able to understand you.

What Benoit described, is just a way to integrate generated code with
the hand-written one. If you don't like it, you can choose your own
one. py++ is pretty flexible.

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/