Re: [pygccxml-development] Function adaptors‏‏

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

2009/8/18 Berserker <ber...@ho...>:
>> for example I noticed that in this release you make use of
>> "boost::python::pure_virtual" which is
>> correct but causes me lots of headaches :) , here is a short explanation
>> of the problem:
>> ""boost::python::pure_virtual" is a custom "visitor" that adds a default
>> implementation
>> (function "pure_virtual_called") which raises an exception.
>
> I noticed that boost::python::pure_virtual is only used for pure virtual
> public methods and not for
> pure virtual protected methods, is this intentional? I think that
> boost::python::pure_virtual
> should be used in pure virtual protected methods too.

Yes, you forget that in C++ it is illegal to take address of non-public member.

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/