Re: [pygccxml-development] Function adaptors‏‏

[Berserker <ber...@ho...>]

> for example I noticed that in this release you make use of "boost::python::pure_virtual" which is
> correct but causes me lots of headaches :) , here is a short explanation of the problem: 
> ""boost::python::pure_virtual" is a custom "visitor" that adds a default implementation 
> (function "pure_virtual_called") which raises an exception.

I noticed that boost::python::pure_virtual is only used for pure virtual public methods and not for
pure virtual protected methods, is this intentional? I think that boost::python::pure_virtual 
should be used in pure virtual protected methods too.


_________________________________________________________________
Porta Messenger in Vacanza! Scaricalo sul cellulare!
http://new.windowslivemobile.msn.com/IT-IT/windows-live-messenger/default.aspx