Re: [pygccxml-development] skipping base classes

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Ken McGaugh <ke...@dn...> wrote:
> The way I imagine it working is that Py++ would list as the base class
> the first ancestor which has not been excluded.

My view is different: if you exclude base class, in this case you want
to "remove" it from hierarchy.
Obviously the choice is arguable.

> Thanks, I'll give that a try.  My main concern is getting the size of
> the module down, and I imaging a class with no members should be fairly
> light-weight.

I think you are right. The binary size, heavily depends on number and
complexity of template instantiations.

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/