|
From: Gustavo C. <gjc...@gm...> - 2008-06-30 12:33:51
|
2008/6/30 Roman Yakovenko <rom...@gm...>:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Gustavo Carneiro <gjc...@gm...>
> wrote:
> > I don't actually _need_ to remove consts from typedefs, only from the
> outer
> > type.
>
> I am not sure you are right. Consider next use case:
>
> struct item_t{};
>
> typedef const item_t c_item_t;
>
> struct value_t{
> c_item_t v;
> };
>
> Obviously, in this case you have to find out whether the "v" is const
> or not, and generate different code.
I see.
I think you're right, but that typedef is kind of evil anyway, and I would
rather deal with corner cases as they appear, particularly since some corner
cases often are theoretical and never manifest themselves in real life.
>
>
> I guess you are talking about some specific use case, which is not this.
>
> > Anyway, I copy-pasted those functions into pybindgen and patched them to
> do
> > what I need, so all is fine now.
>
> :-(. I will see what I can do.
Sorry. :P
If I get into trouble with my simplification, I'll help. Until then...
--
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
INESC Porto, Telecommunications and Multimedia Unit
"The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert
|
