[pygccxml-commit] SF.net SVN: pygccxml: [1241] pyplusplus_dev/unittests

[<rom...@us...>]

Revision: 1241
          http://pygccxml.svn.sourceforge.net/pygccxml/?rev=1241&view=rev
Author:   roman_yakovenko
Date:     2008-02-17 03:44:47 -0800 (Sun, 17 Feb 2008)

Log Message:
-----------
adding new tests 

Modified Paths:
--------------
    pyplusplus_dev/unittests/data/override_bug_to_be_exported.hpp
    pyplusplus_dev/unittests/override_bug_tester.py

Modified: pyplusplus_dev/unittests/data/override_bug_to_be_exported.hpp
===================================================================
--- pyplusplus_dev/unittests/data/override_bug_to_be_exported.hpp	2008-02-17 11:43:23 UTC (rev 1240)
+++ pyplusplus_dev/unittests/data/override_bug_to_be_exported.hpp	2008-02-17 11:44:47 UTC (rev 1241)
@@ -24,6 +24,42 @@
 inline int invoke_foo( const A& a ){
     return a.foo();
 };
+
+class Base1
+{
+public:
+   virtual int eval_a() { return 1; }
+   virtual int eval_b() { return 10; }
+   virtual int eval_c() { return 100; }
+   virtual int eval_d() { return 1000; }
+   virtual int eval_e() { return 10000; }
+};
+
+class Derived2: public Base1
+{
+protected:
+   virtual int eval_a() { return 2; }
+   virtual int eval_b() { return 20; }
+   virtual int eval_c() { return 200; }
+   virtual int eval_d() { return 2000; }
+   virtual int eval_e() { return 20000; }
+};
+
+class Derived3: public Derived2
+{
+};
+
+int eval(Base1* obj) {
+   return
+      obj->eval_a()
+    + obj->eval_b()
+    + obj->eval_c()
+    + obj->eval_d()
+    + obj->eval_e()
+    ;
+}
+
+
 } 
 
 #endif//__final_classes_to_be_exported_hpp__

Modified: pyplusplus_dev/unittests/override_bug_tester.py
===================================================================
--- pyplusplus_dev/unittests/override_bug_tester.py	2008-02-17 11:43:23 UTC (rev 1240)
+++ pyplusplus_dev/unittests/override_bug_tester.py	2008-02-17 11:44:47 UTC (rev 1241)
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
             , tester_t.EXTENSION_NAME
             , *args )
 
+    def customize( self, mb ):
+        mb.class_("Derived2").member_functions("eval_c").exclude()
+
     def run_tests(self, module):        
         class C( module.B ):
             def __init__( self ):
@@ -24,7 +27,26 @@
             def foo( self ):
                 return ord( 'c' )
         self.failUnless( ord('c') == module.invoke_foo( C() ) )
+        
+        class Derived4(module.Derived3):
+            def __init__( self ):
+                module.Derived3.__init__( self )
+            def eval_a(self):
+                return 3
+            def eval_c(self):
+                return 300 # ignored because eval_c excluded
                 
+        self.failUnless( 22223 == module.eval( Derived4() ) )
+        
+        # Notes:
+        # would return 22222 before any patch, since Derived3 wouldn't have a wrapper
+        # would return 22123 with my original "ignore" handling and a list
+        # instead of a set, because eval_c would be excluded naively
+        # would return 22323 if ignore flag wouldn't be considered
+        # would return ????3 (1s in some locations and 2s in others because of
+        # hashing) if set wouldn't be replaced by a list
+        # would return 11113 if protected virtual methods wouldn't be included
+        
 def create_suite():
     suite = unittest.TestSuite()    
     suite.addTest( unittest.makeSuite(tester_t))


This was sent by the SourceForge.net collaborative development platform, the world's largest Open Source development site.