Re: [pygccxml-development] Implicit virtual functions in derived classes

[Roman Y. <rom...@gm...>]

On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Julian Scheid <jul...@rs...> wrote:
>  I'm also not sure whether your only including public virtual functions
>  is correct. Unless I'm missing something, if you declare the "foo"
>  function in my original example protected instead of public you'd still
>  expect it to be overridable.

The code we are dealing with, in this problem is very very fragile. So
I prefer to enhanced it only for use cases I have real test cases.

-- 
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/