>>> "Matthias Urlichs" wrote
> is anybody working on UPDATEs? I find myself needing them. :-/
not yet. send code :)
scanning 2136, it doesn't seem to hard to bolt on top of the
current code, but it really is going to be pretty ugly without
dnssec. On the plus side, we only do clientside right now, so
it's not like we're shipping something insecure out of the box
(when the server side is more complete, then I'd say you should
have to do some explicit changes to the configuration to turn on
updates-not-over-dnssec).
I'll put it in my 'todo' list, or you could submit a bug report
on sf to make sure it's still listed. I'm not likely to get to
it soon - I'm ripping out the guts of the current request/response
objects first...
Anthony
--
Anthony Baxter <an...@in...>
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
|
