[Pydispatcher-devel] Re: dispatcher over xmlrpc

[<po...@or...>]

Drew Perttula <dr...@bi...> writes:

> > Okay.  You probably could leave out that parameter as well, which
> > would send the signal anonymously.  The current version of the code
> > implements Anonymous and Any as class instances.  See the attached file.
> > 
> 
> But anonymous sends seemed to have a sender of None, and None doesn't
> work over xmlrpc. Neither would Anonymous or Any, I suppose.
> 
> Worse, however, is that because you take id() of the sender before
> storing/lookup in the receiver mapping, I can't even use strings as
> senders because their ids are different in my client and server. So
> unless that changes, senders are unsupported in the xmlrpc tunnel (not
> the end of the world).

Let's look at this again, now that we've got the code in SourceForge.

-- 
Patrick K. O'Brien
Orbtech      http://www.orbtech.com/web/pobrien
-----------------------------------------------
"Your source for Python programming expertise."
-----------------------------------------------