Re: [Fwd: [Pydispatcher-devel] Documentation?]

[Patrick K. O'B. <po...@or...>]

On Tuesday 01 July 2003 05:31 pm, Mike C. Fletcher wrote:
> Patrick K. O'Brien wrote:
> >I prefer reST for documentation, or wiki pages.  I've got a wiki site that
> > we can use, if we want.
>
> I'd like to include documentation in the distribution.  Never used reST,
> I tend to write directly in basic HTML w/ class properties and use CSS
> to present it.  That works fine for me, and produces good-looking
> documentation, but I'm certainly open to someone else writing the docs
> in reST ;) , as a last resort, I'll learn reST, but I'm not really
> thrilled with the format.  Wiki is cool for enhancing a basic
> documentation set, but I'm thinking here of "basic usage" and reference
> docs, the kind of things you really want to have available whereever the
> package gets installed.

In that case, please do use whatever you prefer.

> If I'm working on the site, I'd rather use the SF server, I've got batch
> files that allow me to automatically update the website directly via scp
> (once SF gets itself fixed).  Probably easier than giving me an account
> on orbtech.

Okay.  No argument from me.  I was just throwing out options.

-- 
Patrick K. O'Brien
Orbtech      http://www.orbtech.com/web/pobrien
-----------------------------------------------
"Your source for Python programming expertise."
-----------------------------------------------