From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-06-07 23:50:21
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3767170 By: fabioz Are your files in your pythonpath? Do you have any errors in your error log? ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=293649 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-06-13 14:55:22
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3776125 By: nobody Thanks...I just noticed the errors in my error log. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=293649 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-06-14 23:50:54
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3779817 By: xyld This isn't working for me either. To be honest I'm not sure I can even pinpoint how long it hasn't been working for! I can't remember it ever working since I purchased the extension. Code analysis doesn't seem to be working in: a) new projects with a new file, b) old projects, c) old projects with a new file. d) a completely fresh workbench with a new project and a new file. I've checked my settings, code analysis is definitely turned on, auto-build is on, auto-refresh is on. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=293649 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-06-15 08:29:42
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3780198 By: fabioz Have you checked for any message in your error log? Also, are your files under the pythonpath in the project (does it have a source folder configured: http://fabioz.com/pydev/manual_101_project_conf2.html) Chers, Fabio ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=293649 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-06-15 20:26:45
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3781721 By: xyld You are right, of course, Fabio. I _hadn't_ configured my pythonpath correctly, though I thought I had. Just a suggestion -- perhaps some kind of warning could be generated somewhere when it _isn't_ using code analysis on a python file, with possible fixes? It's just that it is a case where it's not immediately obvious that it _isn't_ going, because you might assume there is nothing wrong with the code :) In fact when it did switch on, the only problems I had were import errors. One more question, somewhat related: some of the .so files aren't being picked up from my python path, in this case the lxml etree.so (installed in site-packages/lxml-1.0.1-py2.4-linux-i686.egg/lxml/etree.so). Is there any way to force that? Many thanks, Richard. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=293649 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-06-18 19:11:28
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3784598 By: fabioz Hi Richard, 1. Good you were able to fix it ;-) 2. The fixes without code-analysis are something that are very unlikely to happen, mostly because the fixes are built upon the code-analysis. 3. It should be able to pick it if that folder is in the pythonpath. There is a bug in release 1.1.0 where the pythonpath was not updated if you changed it without pressing apply without any interpreter configured to clear the cache (already fixed for the next release). Cheers, Fabio ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=293649 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-06-18 22:11:15
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3784718 By: xyld Hi Fabio: Regarding fixes: the fixes were something I wasn't really counting on. I guess a "really nice to have" though would be something that tells you that code-analysis isn't switched on for a particular python file. It's not immediately obvious why things like "unused variable" don't work on a random python file :) Regarding folders in python path: I should explain that the module in question (lxml) has been installed from a python 'egg', as seems to be becoming more popular. The egg directories are in the python path, but they _don't_ have an __init__.py in them, because they're not the actual module directories, but rather just _contain_ the module directories. The 'egg' installer (easy-install) puts an easy-install.pth in the site-packages directory, which then adjusts the python path. The only interim solution I can think of is to setup, individually, all the 'eggs' I've installed. Many thanks, Richard. ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=293649 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-06-19 01:58:17
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3784818 By: fabioz Hi Richard... 1. Ok, now I got it ;-) 2. Yeap, I think you have to do it manually... But actually, if it is under the site-packages and your pythonpath is set, when you add the interpreter, it should automatically get it (even if it is in a pth file and not in the env)... That's why I asked about the cache... because if you install it after your interpreter is already configured, you have to remove it, press apply, and then add it again. Cheers, Fabio ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=293649 |