Re: [Pydev-code] Getting started with PyDev scripting

[Joel H. <yo...@if...>]

Hi!

 > Didn't find any problems this time... checked with docstrings, kwargs,
 > defaults, end of doc, etc.

Cool. :-)

 > The only observation is that code-analysis complained about an unused
 > variable -- the first sCurrentLine = oSelection.getCursorLineContents(), in
 > the run method, as you make the same assignment some lines below before
 > using it again.

Ok. The first one is a leftover of sorts. I've deleted it now. Thanks for 
pointing me to it!

Let's give it a few days to let people (Don?) speak their minds before I post 
the definitive v1.0.0 to the list?

 > So, what do you (all) think about which would be the best way to make those
 > scripts available... I was thinking something as putting them (with the
 > authors permission) toghether with the pydev distribution...
 > The authors name would then appear on the script itself and in a brief help
 > in the homepage toghether with an explanation on how the script works.

Seems like an excellent idea.

 > Joel: what do you think about showing as the first script in that list? ;-)

Fine by me. :-)



Fabio Zadrozny wrote:
> Hi Joel, very nice!!
> 
> Didn't find any problems this time... checked with docstrings, kwargs,
> defaults, end of doc, etc.
> The only observation is that code-analysis complained about an unused
> variable -- the first sCurrentLine = oSelection.getCursorLineContents(), in
> the run method, as you make the same assignment some lines below before
> using it again.
> 
> So, what do you (all) think about which would be the best way to make those
> scripts available... I was thinking something as putting them (with the
> authors permission) toghether with the pydev distribution...
> The authors name would then appear on the script itself and in a brief help
> in the homepage toghether with an explanation on how the script works.
> 
> Joel: what do you think about showing as the first script in that list? ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Fabio
> 
> On 4/19/06, Joel Hedlund <yo...@if...> wrote:
> 
>>Hi!
>>
>>New version of my script here. This time I feel it's good enough to call
>>an
>>alpha (comments still appreciated, of course).
>>
>>
>>>I installed and played a little with your script - looking good.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>
>>>Since I am congenitally unable to accept any compiler error messages
>>
>>:-)
>>
>>
>>>    document = document #@UndefinedVariable
>>
>>If I used a global variable named 'document' in my previous version it was
>>most
>>likely because of involuntary namespace pollution, and I hope the new
>>version
>>is free of it.
>>
>>Thanks for your time checking my script out!
>>/Joel Hedlund
>>
>>
>>
> 
>