From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-05-19 13:03:00
|
Bugs item #1967068, was opened at 2008-05-19 06:03 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=120937&aid=1967068&group_id=20937 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Blowfish differs from others Initial Comment: Blowfish in pycrypto produces different results that many other implementations, e.g. Java's JCE, Bruce Schneier's reference implementation, crypto etc. Reproduce by doing the following encryption in different languages: binascii.hexlify(Blowfish.new("1234567890123456").encrypt("12345678")) PyCrypto outputs: 61d2570dc6e09632 Java, Schneier's C implementation, openssl output: e00723bbb58234aa In both cases it was same little-endian machine. st...@ya... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=120937&aid=1967068&group_id=20937 |