Re: [PyCrust] Some enhancements. Any interest?
Brought to you by:
pobrien
From: Sebastian H. <ha...@ms...> - 2006-03-01 17:40:58
|
Hi Patrick! Good to hear from you ! That sounds great that you are still with us and with PyCrust ;-) + why is there a need for a special "PyCrust subversion" - isn't PyCrust now "part" of wxPython !? see below... + I would really suggest to stop using the pycrust-users list for now ... (I'm cross posting to wxPython-users) + Further I would suggest to IMMEDIATELY make a note to the sourceforge page that PyCrust 0.6 from 2001(?) is NOT the latest and that instead there it is now (more) incorporated into wxPython itself ( refer wxPython.org frontpage and also the wxPython wiki) + To clarify on the name: As Robin wrote just recently (2006-02-15 14:08: "Re: [wxPython-users] Re: Pycrust enhancement with plugins") I would like get your - Patrick - blessing of officially calling the whole project "PyCrust" again - "Py" is too often used as generic prefix as not googleble either ! + I had some improvements myself that mostly made it into the 2.6.2 wPython version (see ChangeLog): most often I use the "free edit"-mode to clean out 100s of lines of "accidental" output; also I like using the search function; the folding function should be made to support nested folds, but I'm not really using it much anymore... What I do use a lot is: drag&drop of files into the shell window to trigger a "paste" of the filename. (I don't think this made it into wxPython !) + I like Bill's idea of adding 'ls' and 'cd' (or other shell functions) - the same way IPython does it -- but I'm not clear of what a good "syntax" would be for this (maybe just a '.[a-zA-Z ]' at the start of the line (or even a space ' ') -- I just think that IPython is much to complex and should not be followed all the way ... + I /would/ like "tab"-completion on variable-, module-, function-, module-attributes-,... names (if not unique a popup) -- but this is just an idea... Thanks for PyCrust ! Sebastian Haase On Wednesday 01 March 2006 04:51, Patrick K. O'Brien wrote: > Sebastian Haase wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > Yes *I* was somehow on this list (didn't know though) ;-) > > Good to hear that PyCrust is alive ! > > I would suggest: > > Please repost your message directly to the wxPython-users list. > > With the last update of 2.6.2 there have been some improvements to > > PyCrust - some overlap with yours ... > > > > I certainly agree that the sourceforge page is nothing but a trap !! It > > should be deleted ! Or clearly stated that wxPython.org (maybe it's > > wiki) is the place to look. > > I am interested in changes and enhancements to PyCrust. I'm planning to > provide Subversion and Trac support as well as a website (pycrust.org) > to support these community efforts. Once that is in place I will shut > down the sourceforge project, or at least make sure it redirects better. > For now the wxPython-users list is the best place to discuss these things. |