RE: [PyCrust] Significant refactoring

[Patrick K. O'B. <po...@or...>]

Attached is the latest version of the code, including some things that
aren't even in cvs yet. As you can see, a few things are being rearranged.
Let me know what you think. And thanks for sharing your program as well.

---
Patrick K. O'Brien
Orbtech
"I am, therefore I think."

-----Original Message-----
From: pyc...@li...
[mailto:pyc...@li...]On Behalf Of Chin H. Wu
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:41 AM
To: pyc...@li...
Subject: Re: [PyCrust] Significant refactoring

Please e-mail me the modifications. I don't have CVS installed in my machine
yet.

Here is the program I mentioned. As you can see, the modification is quite
simple. If you have a window machine, you can double click on CmdConsole.py
to get started. You can try CmdCrust if you have PyCrust-0.5.1. I can update
it after I get your new version of PyCrustAlaCarte.py.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick K. O'Brien" <po...@or...>
To: <pyc...@li...>
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:44 PM
Subject: RE: [PyCrust] Significant refactoring


> I have changed the Shell class to allow you to pass an
> Interpreter-compatible class (or subclass of Interpreter) and any number
of
> additional parameters required by your class. PyCrustAlaCarte.py was also
> fixed and now uses a subclass of PyCrust.interpreter.Interpreter called
> InterpreterAlaCarte. I think this should give you the flexibility you are
> looking for. If not, holler.
>
> The changes have been checked into CVS and are available there now. A zip
> file release should be available later this week. Let me know if you can't
> do CVS and need the files sooner.
>
> P.S. Is there any chance you'd like to share your program? It sounds like
> you might have some interesting enhancements.
>
> ---
> Patrick K. O'Brien
> Orbtech
> "I am, therefore I think."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pyc...@li...
> [mailto:pyc...@li...]On Behalf Of Chin H. Wu
> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 11:24 PM
> To: pyc...@li...
> Subject: Re: [PyCrust] Significant refactoring
>
> I have a program that runs from the command line. This program is a hybrid
> of cmd.py and code.py that I can take an arbitrary program and turns that
> into something like a builtin keyword. For example, I have a command
called
> foo, which will prints out the input contents:
>     def foo(in):
>         print in
>
> And I can call this command like:
>     Python > foo 1
> or
>     Python > foo a
> where "a" is a defined variable.
> But it goes beyond calling the commands in a simple statement like above,
I
> can also do this:
>     for i in range(3):
>         foo i
>
> For all practical purpose, the command behaves like a builtin keyword like
> 'print'. It is very similar to PyCrust.pseudo.PseudoKeyword if you know
what
> I means.
>
> I wrote the program by modifying the code.py and by subclassing the
> InteractiveInterpreter. The idea is very similar to Interpreter class in
> PyCrust. In PyCrust-0.5.1, I can make minimum modification to my program
and
> make it work with PyCrust and wxPython. This doesn't work with
PyCrust-0.5.3
> because I don't see an easy way to subclass the Interpreter class. I like
> some of the features PyCrust provides and wish to make my program work
with
> PyCrust. Hence I would petition to keep the Interpreter class
subclassable.
> That opens a lot of possiblity.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PyCrust-users mailing list
> PyC...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pycrust-users