From: Neal N. <nno...@gm...> - 2010-12-21 03:59:37
|
That's fantastic! Thanks Thomas. I'll look over the changes and try to test things out. n PS. I love seeing all the recent changes go by. On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Thomas Vander Stichele <th...@ap...> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I had a moment of focus this weekend so I fixed up pychecker for Python > 2.7: > > http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1268 > > Right now it fails as many or even less tests than Python 2.6. > > I'm going to do some more general cleanup and possibly some > implementations of opcodes I found missing by running it on some > projects, but it's definitely a major and needed improvement. > > Feel free to give it a test and me some feedback before I release. I > don't want to end up with egg on my face for my first pychecker release. > > Thanks > Thomas > > -- > I can't go away with you on a rock climbing weekend > What if something's on TV and it's never shown again > Just as well I'm not invited I'm afraid of heights > I lied about being the outdoor type > -- > MOAP - Maintaining your projects since 2006 > https://apestaart.org/moap/trac/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Lotusphere 2011 > Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how > to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment > to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d > _______________________________________________ > PyChecker-list mailing list > PyC...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pychecker-list > |