RE: [Pyblosxom-devel] next steps

[Blake W. <bl...@ph...>]

> > Either way, I've made my suggestion, and I'll be
> > more than happy to code to whatever we settle on,
> > so other than possibly voting, I think my
> > contribution to this topic is done.
> Ok, my 2cents.  If there's PEP for a coding style
> for Python, I think that We should stick close to
> that -- I'm willing to reformat the code I've checked
> in to match the PEP-8 guidelines.  If it's not
> specified in PEP-8, then I don't care much.  I can
> get used to lots.

Okay, so that's two votes for using the Lyntin standard.

At this point, I'll change my vote and say "Let's just
use the Lyntin standard as it stands", so that we can
all agree and get back to the important stuff.

For instance, I would be more than happy to help you
re-stabilize the core, if I knew which changes to make.
If Will wanted to assign files to me, I would make the
changes, and email them back, so that he could test them
before checking them in.  (I would try to test myself,
but I don't know if we're going to check in the partially
destabilized code, so that I can test.  I guess I could
get a copy of it from Will.  That might not be a bad
idea, now that I think about it.)

Later,
Blake.