|
From: Wari W. <wa...@ce...> - 2003-02-10 11:41:23
|
* Blake Winton <bl...@ph...> [030210 07:35]: > Okay, my initial thoughts are: The Audience is pretty much what I had > come up with before, although that's a great name for it. Audience, that's a great name! Let's use Vellum :) > The custom fields are an interesting idea, but I think they're a > hang-over from C, since in Python you can add any fields you want to > any object, so there should be no reason to have them there. You can add custom fields? Hmm, entries can add custom variable, want more fields, we can do foo(**kwargs), what happens after that? > I can see what it's trying to do with the vellum.functions and it's a > neat idea. We might want to use that, Wari. That should be easy to do, right Will :) Will told me that our Callback transformation is more powerful, also ours seems limited now cause we have very little thinks to callback with our api, but it will grow I assure you :) >> pickle, db, etc... > Easier to write to the data files with vi? for DBM: db_dump -p dbfile > db.dump vim db.dump db_load db.dump etc etc for pickle: import pickle :) Stupid, but hey :) > As a programmer, none of you will have to write the code to read or > write XML. I'll do all of that coding for you. In fact, I'm half > done. http://www.latte.ca/cgi-bin/source.py?name=file Great piece of work there :) > I did some tests with adding and removing data, and it was on the > order of 0.02 ms to call get, passing it a type of Storage.COMMENTS on > a document with three comments. I don't know if that scales yet, but > I've got a whack of sample data from Wari, so I'll run some more > tests, and see what happens. I am, however, cautiously optimistic. Go load a page with the harry potter porn comments :) You'll see how fast it can render 100 comments I've got other sample data with 516 entries and 1376 comments and growing :) -- Regards: Wari Wahab Senior R&D Engineer Celestix Networks http://www.celestix.com/ |