|
From: will kahn-g. <wi...@bl...> - 2010-08-09 14:33:38
|
I released PyBlosxom 1.5 rc2 last week and also updated PyPI. So "pip install pyblosxom" works now. Additionally, I tweaked the PyBlosxom web-site, so doing "pip install -f http://pyblosxom/bluesock.org/ pyblosxom" also works now. I forgot to add download_url to the metadata in setup.py. I'll do that in the next release. After doing that, PyPI will pick it up and other versions of "pip install" should work better. Thank you for pointing this out! /will On 07/25/2010 10:17 AM, Frédéric Hébert wrote: > Hello, > > (my apologies I've subscribed for the digest form of the list and then > could not retrieve the thread and then could not answer to it in the > right place) > > Pip works in a very similar way of easy_install, by listing and caching > links from Pypi indexes and honours options like '--find-links', > '--index-url' and so on. It seems that pip could not retrieve archives > from sourceforge links. I made a test with PyFFI package of which Pypi > index offers only sourceforge download links. > It failed also (see http://pastebin.com/iagLGjje). > > On the contrary, easy_install can install (pyblosxom) from sourceforge > links. easy_install pyblosxom works ! > > In regards to the download page of bluesock.org, AFAICS pip honours a > default level of recursion (maybe 2 ??) and then don't reach the > download page. > > Anyway, IMHO the best way to get rid of these "limitations" (?) is to > add a link to http://pyblosxom.bluesock.org/download/ from pyblosxom 's > pypi index. > (see the result of 'pip install -f > http://pyblosxom.bluesock.org/download/ -U --log log.txt pyblosxom' at > http://pastebin.com/NXmJV0Tv). > > Frédéric |