RE: [Py2exe-users] Re: msvcr71.dll missing

[Tony M. <t-...@ih...>]

[Thomas Heller]
>> Would it be useful to print a list of dlls which were found to be 
>> needed as binary dependencies but not included automatically by 
>> py2exe?

+1 - I think something like your example list would be great.

[Fuzzy]
> What would also be good is running the same test on a clean 
> windows XP (windows 98/NT/Me ??) install and seeing which 
> aren't available as standard (and so might need to be 'made 
> available').

If you have the time and resources to do this, then I agree that this would
be a useful addition.  However, I can see that it would be extremely time
consuming to do so.  A wiki, perhaps, to share the load?  The dependencies
list without this would still be great, I think, and wouldn't inconvenience
anyone that didn't need it.

=Tony.Meyer