From: le d. <le....@la...> - 2008-06-30 15:54:03
|
Just after sending my message, I saw this topic. Maybe I can test this patch but I cannot build C code so if someone as a build of it I am interested. Jimmy Retzlaff a écrit : > On 4/25/08 11:25 AM, "Thomas Heller" <th...@ct...> wrote: >> It seems that using >> '1' instead of '0' at least does no harm, but it would be nice to have someone >> else on Vista confirm the problem and that your new patch fixes it: >> >> Thomas >> >> Index: source/py2exe_util.c >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /cvsroot/py2exe/py2exe/source/py2exe_util.c,v >> retrieving revision 1.14 >> diff -r1.14 py2exe_util.c >> 186c186 >> < static rt_icon_id = 0; >> --- >>> static rt_icon_id = 1; > > I'm not able to duplicate the problem with or without the patch. I see my > test icon fine on W2K, XP, XP64, Vista, and Vista 64 (these are all > US/English versions). Poking around in the EXEs that ship with Vista, I see > that the icon ids are all over the place. I didn't find any that start at 0, > but I found one starting at 1, another at 17, another at 100. I also tried > -1 and that worked fine. > > Jimmy > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > Py2exe-users mailing list > Py2...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/py2exe-users > > |