Bugs item #1456637, was opened at 2006-03-23 02:32
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=618943&aid=1456637&group_id=97739
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Pedro Algarvio (s0undt3ch)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: When will there be an object oriented py-rrdtool?
Initial Comment:
When will there be an object oriented py-rrdtool?
It's terrebly hard to code with the way the python
bindings are built.
Sure for a custom script it's more than enough, but if
you're trying to build a dynamic python app that uses
rrdtool, hell it's extremely hard!
As an example take a look at
pyrrd(http://projects.adytum.us/tracs/PyRRD), a wrapper
on top of rrdtool, that is suposed to some day support
the python bindings. Right now it passes everything to
subprocess.Popen and does not escape '(' and ')' for
example, nor does it support 'a title with spaces' for
example, it's extremely imature, but it's the way this
bindings should go I think.
Thanks for the job done so far...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=618943&aid=1456637&group_id=97739
|
