From: A.M. K. <aku...@us...> - 2001-07-11 18:54:29
|
Update of /cvsroot/py-howto/pyhowto In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv25953 Modified Files: python-22.tex Log Message: Note addition of xmlrpclib Comment out descr-branch section Update e-mail address (Time to begin writing this...) Index: python-22.tex =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/py-howto/pyhowto/python-22.tex,v retrieving revision 1.3 retrieving revision 1.4 diff -C2 -r1.3 -r1.4 *** python-22.tex 2001/06/27 20:32:12 1.3 --- python-22.tex 2001/07/11 18:54:26 1.4 *************** *** 6,10 **** \release{0.01} \author{A.M. Kuchling} ! \authoraddress{\email{am...@bi...}} \begin{document} \maketitle\tableofcontents --- 6,10 ---- \release{0.01} \author{A.M. Kuchling} ! \authoraddress{\email{aku...@me...}} \begin{document} \maketitle\tableofcontents *************** *** 15,23 **** final version of Python 2.2 is released. Currently it's not up to date at all. Please send any comments, bug reports, or questions, no ! matter how minor, to \email{am...@bi...}. } ! This article explains the new features in Python 2.2. ! Python 2.2 includes some significant changes that go far toward cleaning up ! the language's darkest corners. This article doesn't attempt to provide a complete specification for --- 15,23 ---- final version of Python 2.2 is released. Currently it's not up to date at all. Please send any comments, bug reports, or questions, no ! matter how minor, to \email{aku...@me...}. } ! This article explains the new features in Python 2.2. Python 2.2 ! includes some significant changes that go far toward cleaning up the ! language's darkest corners, and some exciting new features. This article doesn't attempt to provide a complete specification for *************** *** 56,69 **** %====================================================================== ! \section{PEP 252: Type and Class Changes} ! XXX ! \begin{seealso} ! \seepep{252}{Making Types Look More Like Classes}{Written and implemented ! by GvR.} ! \end{seealso} %====================================================================== --- 56,72 ---- %====================================================================== ! % It looks like this set of changes isn't going to be getting into 2.2, ! % unless someone plans to merge the descr-branch back into the mainstream ! % very quickly. ! %\section{PEP 252: Type and Class Changes} ! %XXX ! %\begin{seealso} ! %\seepep{252}{Making Types Look More Like Classes}{Written and implemented ! %by GvR.} ! %\end{seealso} %====================================================================== *************** *** 82,86 **** \begin{itemize} ! \item XXX \end{itemize} --- 85,89 ---- \begin{itemize} ! \item xmlrpclib added to standard library. \end{itemize} |
From: Eric S. R. <es...@th...> - 2001-07-11 19:00:45
|
A.M. Kuchling <aku...@us...>: > *************** > *** 82,86 **** > \begin{itemize} > > ! \item XXX > > \end{itemize} > --- 85,89 ---- > \begin{itemize} > > ! \item xmlrpclib added to standard library. > > \end{itemize} Does this mean xmlrpclib has been checked in? Should I start working on documentation? -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> No matter how one approaches the figures, one is forced to the rather startling conclusion that the use of firearms in crime was very much less when there were no controls of any sort and when anyone, convicted criminal or lunatic, could buy any type of firearm without restriction. Half a century of strict controls on pistols has ended, perversely, with a far greater use of this weapon in crime than ever before. -- Colin Greenwood, in the study "Firearms Control", 1972 |
From: Andrew K. <aku...@me...> - 2001-07-11 19:07:59
|
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:05:22PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: >Does this mean xmlrpclib has been checked in? Should I start working on >documentation? Yes. Don't have access to your python-checkins mail at the moment? /F checked it in a few hours ago, so you can probably start working on docs. Might want to check if /F has some already, though. --amk |
From: Eric S. R. <es...@th...> - 2001-07-11 22:27:30
|
Andrew Kuchling <aku...@me...>: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 03:05:22PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > >Does this mean xmlrpclib has been checked in? Should I start working on > >documentation? > > Yes. Don't have access to your python-checkins mail at the moment? > /F checked it in a few hours ago, so you can probably start working on > docs. Might want to check if /F has some already, though. He doesn't and I am. I'm writing the section on type marshalling now. -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> It will be of little avail to the people, that the laws are made by men of their own choice, if the laws be so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood; if they be repealed or revised before they are promulgated, or undergo such incessant changes that no man, who knows what the law is to-day, can guess what it will be to-morrow. Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed? -- James Madison, Federalist Papers 62 |
From: Fred L. D. Jr. <fd...@ac...> - 2001-07-11 19:41:45
|
Eric S. Raymond writes: > Does this mean xmlrpclib has been checked in? Should I start working on > documentation? Yes, and please! Just check in Doc/lib/libxmlrpmlib.tex whenever you're ready, and I'll cross the i's and dot the t's. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Digital Creations |