[Pxlib-devel] AMD64 compatibility
Brought to you by:
steinm
From: Stefan de K. <sk...@xs...> - 2006-03-23 19:15:02
|
Hi, I tested 0.5.1 & 0.6.0 on AMD64, the latest version of pxlib seems to be=20 'more' compatible but still: l$yTbC]y=E4,-5072,21257,=F88IklF5/ x{UR#}.I?k=20 =E5`=C6~3J,o1FQg!y=F8inJ.7&L(LP6&oWYPr-j: 5_uZw_$X(ANq,1195696568,-206925907,-1499220558,-37570930,-1831090744,4490= 98795,-2030980732,1174416124,711505295,716169135,1814333494,314347085,-12= 82300623,-5601,-12079,1532909-08-02,-4396,,11481078,-1962998092,151574333= 7,754908834,442065620,2050678037,1058935580,-955970893,1563752764,-101760= 2794 BXualB#=C6,-31612,-4288,"a=3DZ~"HR.)}Ge H6HQhkP[6?8*tE` PXLib: Blob data is not contained in record and a blob file is not set. alot of fuss is comming thru. Trying it on an Athlon does work so I=20 guess this is broken by design. 20170,0,1,If you want me to stay,Sly & The Family=20 Stone,0,0,11870,159566,168057,168516,4620,0,0,0,173136,-6,5,0,0,1971-01-0= 1,1,,-1,,,,,,,,, This looks more like the expected output. (error and good output are=20 picked randomly) Yours Sincerely, Stefan de Konink |